Legal Opinion

Schulenburg v. Robison

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: McMurray v. Taylor, 30 Mo. 263 ; Ashdown v. Woods, 31 Mo. 465 ; Muir v. Gross, 10 B. Mon. 277 ; Gfrahamv. Holt, 4 B. Mon. 61; Wheeler v. Sehroeder, 4 E. I. 383 ; Bailey v. Hull, 11 Wis. 289. cited: Waterman v. Younger, 49 Mo. 413 ; Gantner v. Kemper, 58 Mo. 567.

1Opinion of the CourtHayden, J.

This is a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien against the house of Culver, one of the defendants, for a balance of $593.53, for lumber furnished by the plaintiffs, as sub-contractors of Bobison & Son, the contractors. One of the members of the firm of Bobison & Son having died, his administrator was made a defendant. The defendant Culver, answering separately, alleged that the building was completed about Nov. 18, 1875, and that on that date he paid Bobison & Son in full for the lumber ; that before that time, Bobison &-Son had paid to the plaintiffs the amount of the bill in suit. The case was…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rinzel v. StumpfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hayden v. LoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Compound Lumber Co. v. Fehlhammer Planing Mill Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Hannon v. LoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Rand v. GrubbsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API