Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Rushmore v. Van Ruler

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 24, 1987No. C5-86-1206PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Respondent First State Bank of Rushmore sued appellant Martin Van Ruler for non payment of promissory notes. Respondent moved for summary judgment. The trial court took the matter under advisement and gave the parties more time to furnish briefs.

In June 1985, appellant retained different counsel. In an order dated September 3, 1985, the trial court granted summary judgment to respondent, ordered respondent to submit a statement of requested attorney fees to be awarded, and stayed the judgment. Appellant now moved for a new trial, raising, for the first time, the defense…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First Bank East v. BobeldykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Dahl v. Lanesboro State BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. VanderWeyst v. First State Bank of BensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Walsh v. First State Bank of PennockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Schemmel v. State Bank of PennockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API