Legal Opinion

Charles D. Goines v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 23, 2001No. 01-3092PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The principal issue is whether the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) correctly dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, the petitioner Goines’ appeal from the withholding of a within-grade increase, because Goines had not requested reconsideration of that action by his agency. Goines v. Dep’t of Agric., Nos. DC-531D-00-0424-I-1 and DC-3443-00-0463-1-1 (Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. May 30, 2000) (“Initial Decision”). We affirm.

I

Under the General Schedule for government employees, which covered the position Goines had with the Department of Agriculture, there are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William E. Willis, II v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Kenneth E. Knollenberg v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Gregorio A. Toquero v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gene M. Munson v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Meeker v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  3. Varnado v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Kerwin M. Smith v. Department of Homeland Security, Merit Systems Protection Board2016
  5. Meeker v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API