Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Rossell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Reargument of an appeal by George W. Gamble, individually and as administrator, etc., of Elizabeth Gamble, deceased, and others, from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Sullivan, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 12th day of November, 1906, judicially settling the accounts of the personal representatives of the deceased executors of the last will and testament of Elizabeth Gamble, deceased. (See 121 App. Div. 381; 122 id. 904.)

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, J.:

The opinion on the former argument of this appeal is reported in 121 Appellate Division, 381. It was then held that the decree erroneously determined that a legacy of $2,000 bequeathed to Mrs. Rossell by her mother, Elizabeth Gamble, remained in the hands of *608John Gamble, the father and coexecutor of Mrs. Bossell under her mother’s will until the death of said John Gamble which occurred five months after the death of Mrs. Bossell and seven years after the death of their testatrix, Elizabeth Gamble.

On the application of the executors of Mrs. Bossell a referee has since been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. TrainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Barrett, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1899
  2. In re RossellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API