Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bozeman v. Tifton Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1984No. 68618Published

1ConcurrencePope, Judge

I concur in the judgment of the majority, but point out that my agreement is based upon the failure of the movant to carry its burden on summary judgment rather than the strength of appellant’s evidence. Appellant will, however, at trial have the heavy burden of proving appellee’s wilful violation of the statute. See OCGA § 10-1-38 (c).

*654There is no question that appellee violated OCGA § 10-1-33 by computing certain finance charges using an illegal method. This violation triggered the penalty provision of OCGA § 10-1-38 (b). “The entire finance charge was therefore forfeited.” Bozeman v. Tifton…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. GLENN'S FURNITURE CO. INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Bozeman v. Tifton Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Lee v. NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF COLUMBUSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API