Legal Opinion

Bell v. Demax Management Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2002No. 2001-CA-0692Published

1Opinion of the Court

| /TOBIAS, Judge.

The plaintiff, Calvin Bell, appeals the granting of the defendants’ exception of prescription by the trial court. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the judgment and reinstate the default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

*1075In 1990, Mr. Bell began working for the defendants, Demax Management, Inc., Thibaut HG Corporation, Thibaut Properties C Corporation, Central Village Apartments, and Maple Leaf Apartments, as an independent contractor. He alleges that the defendants informed him that he was required to carry workers’ compensation insurance, but he could not acquire…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Guillot v. Consolidated FreightwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API