Legal Opinion

Walso v. Latterner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 25, 1919No. 21,372PublishedCited by 9 opinions

After the first appeal reported in 140 Minn. 455, 168 N. W. 353, the ease was tried before Hale, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for defendant. From an order denying their motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

On April 8, 1911, Thomas J. Latterner deposited $5,000 in the Farmers and Mechanics Savings Bank of Minneapolis in his own name “in trust for Oliver F. Latterner.” He died on December 26, 1915. Shortly after his death the bank pass book was delivered to Oliver who presented it to the bank and drew ont the money. Plaintiffs, as administrators of *365the estate of Thomas J. Latterner, brought this action to recover the money from Oliver, on the ground that it was the property of Thomas at his death and belonged to his estate. The action has been tried twice. At the first trial the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walso v. LatternerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. Scott v. HaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Riley v. LidtkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dyste v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. In Re Estate of JeruzalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Rickel v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. In Re Guardianship of OverpeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Coughlin v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API