Legal Opinion
Austin v. Gallaher
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 14, 1967No. 14583PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLINGEMAN, Justice.
Action of H. T. Gallaher against C. H. Austin and C. H. Austin, Jr., for breach of contract involving an alleged sale of certain candy vending machines. Trial was by the court without a jury and judgment entered in favor of plaintiff against defendants for the sum of $3,000.00, interest and costs. No findings of fact or conclusions of law were requested or filed by the trial court.
The C. H. Austin Candy Company was the distributor for the Tom Houston Peanut Company and operated and maintained a large number of candy vending machines over an area covering a substantial part…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Abilene v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- O.'Ferral v. CoolidgeTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. PillowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Victory Carriers, Inc., a Corporation v. Stockton Stevedoring Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Mercer v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Williams v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Bonham v. BaldeschwilerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Pierce v. Ranger Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969