Van Tine v. Van Tine

Defendant appeals from decree of divorce granted plaintiff. He raises issues in Ms statement of questions involved, wMch are not'discussed in Ms brief. Accordingly, they are treated as abandoned or waived and will not be considered. Parks v. Pere Marquette R. Co., 315 Mich 38; Wilkinson v. Lanterman, 314 Mich 568. Under “argument” in his brief defendant says the issues now involve plaintiff’s right to a divorce and the equities of the property settlement.

The parties were first married in 1938 and divorced in 1944. They remarried in 1948. No children were born to the marriages. Plaintiff…