Legal Opinion

Brodowski v. Supowitz

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 14, 1982No. 81-447PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

The defendant Nathan Supowitz appeals the Trial Court’s {Wyman, J.) decision denying his motion for leave to file an appearance and an answer more than two years after the return day of the bill in equity and writ filed in an action against him. We affirm.

The plaintiff, Karen Brodowski, commenced an action against the defendants Nathan Supowitz and Edward Dudley for their alleged failure to complete contracts for real estate transactions. On July 31, 1979, the plaintiff filed a bill in equity, and on August 14, 1979, by a writ of summons, she brought an action at law. Both actions had a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. DuranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. American Board of Trade, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Kennedy v. ShawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. D'AGINCOURT v. Anderson Foreign Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Clark v. BradstreetSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sununu v. Clamshell AllianceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. Barton v. HayesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. Cote v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Peaslee v. KoenigSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. S.M.W. Seiko, Inc. v. Howard Concrete Pumping Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API