Legal Opinion

Haack v. Midwest Life Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1936No. 29640PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is a suit upon an accident policy for the loss of an eye. Defendant’s motion for directed verdict was overruled, and a verdict returned for $890.04, with $250 attorney fees. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiff sued on an accident policy of $2,500 issued by defendant, for which the premium was $1.32 a month,, and which provided for one-third of the face of the policy for the loss of an eye. Plaintiff ran the shoe shop in the basement of Magee’s store in Lincoln, and while operating a sand emery wheel on a lathe on August 10, 1933, dirt and sand flew up in his face, and some of it lodged in his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Woodmen Accident Ass'n v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Chapin v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hilmer v. Western Travelers Accident Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. George v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vaughn B. Hunter v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  2. Clark v. State Farmers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API