Legal Opinion

Cataldi v. Sal Finocchiaro Motor Freight

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 27520PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, District Judge.

The plaintiff, in this motor vehicle case, seeks a new trial upon the grounds that we erred in various aspects of our charge to the jury.1 After trial of this *922action the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants.

Since the notes of testimony, with the exception of our charge, have not been transcribed, we will have to rely upon our memory, the pleadings and briefs of counsel to dispose of this motion.

This accident occurred on May 13, 1958, at about 9 p. m. on the New Jersey Turnpike in Mercer County. At this portion of the Turnpike it is a straight road composed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hawn v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Barry v. Borden Farm Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  4. Clayton v. VallasterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  5. Lillie Bailey v. Naomi E. Branin, Administratrix of the Estate of Wilbur H. Branin, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paiva v. PfeifferNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API