The PEOPLE v. Carr

Defendant was convicted, after a trial by the court without a jury, of the crime of armed robbery and, in accordance with the Habitual Criminal Act, was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of from seven years to life. He brings this writ of error under Rule 65 — 1 to review his conviction. His only contention on this writ of error is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction.

Defendant’s principal argument is that the testimony of the State’s principal witness, Cleveland Alexander, the complainant, was unsatisfactory, contradictory, improbable, unduly prejudicial and…