Marable v. Mayer, Son & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Mortgages. Estoppel. Attorney and Client. Before Judge Branham. Floyd Superior Court. September Adjourned Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
Marable, being indebted to Mayer, Son & Company by promissory note, executed a mortgage deed to a certain stock of goods, located in a certain house in the city of Rome, to secure the payment of said notes. This mortgage was foreclosed,' and Marable filed his affidavit of *61illegality, whereby he claimed that there was no such stock of goods as the stock described in the mortgage when the same was executed, and that the mortgage was void because the same was witnessed by the attorney of Mayer, Son & Company, as a notary public. The jury found the issues formed on the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- King v. SearsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Budget Charge Accounts, Inc. v. PetersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Hawes v. GlovesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Thomas v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.