Legal Opinion

Stimal v. Jewett & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hinman, J.:

The sole question in this case is whether the accident arose in the course of the claimant’s employment. The claimant was engaged in general carpentry work for the employer, whose plant was situated a considerable distance outside of the city of Buffalo. The claimant resided within the city of Buffalo. He had no work to do for his employer outside of the plant. There was a trolley line running near the plant from the city of Buffalo which was customarily used by the Buffalo employees for which a transportation charge of ten cents was paid. During the winter in which the accident…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Littler v. George A. Fuller Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Claim of Stimal v. Jewett & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern States Manufacturing Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Neyland v. Maryland Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Claim of Glaser v. Ideal Guarantee Roofing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Cramblitt v. Standard Accident InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API