Legal Opinion

Berg v. Rapid Motor Vehicle Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 28, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On error to Hudson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Minturn, J.

The plaintiff at the time of this investment wa^ a clerk in a hat store in Jersey City. He conceived the idea of entering into the business of conveying passengers for hire in a sight-seeing automobile in and about Asbury Park in this state, and, intending to form a company for the purpose, notified the defendant, which was a corporation engaged in the manufacture of automobiles at Pontiac, Michigan, that he was ready to do business. This resulted in a series of letters between the parties, including the sending of defendant’s catalogue for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. New Jersey School & Church Furniture Co. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  3. Story v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  4. Woodward v. EmmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  5. Curtis & Co. Manufacturing v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Locks Laboratories, Inc. v. Bloomfield Molding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. General Home Improvement Co. v. American Ladder Co.New Jersey Circuit Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API