Legal Opinion

State v. Amber Suzanne Hneidy

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided June 26, 2013No. 04-12-00692-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by:

PATRICIA 0. ALVAREZ, Justice.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s order granting Appellee Amber Suzanne Hneidy’s motion to suppress evidence. On appeal, the State argues that the trial court erred (1) by refusing to consider all the evidence presented, (2) by applying the incorrect burden of proof to the State, (3) by failing to apply the standard for reasonable suspicion objectively, and (4) by incorrectly determining that under the totality of the circumstances Officer Eubank did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Ap-pellee.

Background

On the night of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Kothe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Valtierra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Marco Alvarado-ZarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Benjamin Fred Clark v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2026
  3. David Ray Baker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020
  4. Nicanor C. Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2019
  5. State v. Dyandra Christine Ysassi, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API