Legal Opinion

Patton v. St. Francis Hospital

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 14, 2000No. A00A1672PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Chief Judge.

This case concerns the applicability of the statutory discovery cloak afforded under the peer review and medical review statutes. Dr. Robert Patton contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to compel discovery directed to St. Francis Hospital because (1) a malice exception applies to the discovery privileges, (2) the medical review and peer review statutes do not apply where the process itself is under attack, and (3) the medical review committee failed to strictly adhere to its bylaws. We find no merit in Patton’s arguments and affirm the trial court’s order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emory Clinic v. HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Eubanks v. FerrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Freeman v. Piedmont HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Baldwin County Hospital Authority v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Patton v. St. Francis HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Belnap v. HowardUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  3. HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF VALDOSTA & LOWNDES CTY. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF VALDOSTA & LOWNDES CTY. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API