Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Douglas v. Tune

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 2, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtWoodson, J.

Counsel for relator has made a terse and clear statement of this ease in his brief. It reads as follows:

“This is an original proceeding by mandamus to compel the members of the Board of Complaint in the City of St. Louis to allow the relator, or his agent or attorney, to inspect and "make a copy of the letter written November 29, 1916, by Lawrence McDaniel and George E. Thomas, in which libelous statements were made against the relator, who is an employee of the city of St. Louis, in the Sewer Department.

“The Board of Complaint was created by the Charter of the city of St. Louis, and by that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Mansfield v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. State ex rel. Douglas v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. State Ex Rel. Hazel v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. v. MuellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API