Bonnette v. Ford Motor Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COOKS, Judge.
| ,In this automobile redhibition case, the Defendant-Manufacturer appeals the lower court judgment awarding the Plaintiffs-Buyers a return of the purchase price, all expenses surrounding the sale, and attorney fees. For the following reasons, finding no manifest error in the lower court’s finding that Plaintiffs met their burden of proving the vehicle was defective when purchased and that they would not have purchased it had they known of the defect, we affirm the judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 7, 2007, Plaintiffs, Huey and Margaret Bonnette, purchased a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Nee v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Rey v. CucciaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Young v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bruce v. Ford Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- George L. Bruce v. Ford Motor CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013