United States v. Timberlake
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
DeFORD, Judge:
The appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of possession and distribution of heroin, possession of drug paraphernalia and possession of marijuana in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934.
The appellant among several assignments of error contends that the military judge committed error in that Specification 1, possession of heroin and Specification 2, distribution of heroin were not considered multiplicious for sentence purposes. He further contends that error was committed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. HeflinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. KleinhansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. MayoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982