Rauma v. Lamont
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $500 damages against each of defendants for assault and battery and imprisonment of plaintiff’s minor son. The case was tried before Cant, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
This action was brought by the father of a minor in his son’s behalf, under G-. S. 1894, § 5164, to recover upon two separate causes of action: First, for an assault and battery; second, for false imprisonment. The action arises out of the facts detailed in the case of Eauma v.- Bailey, 80 Minn. 336, 83 N. W. 191. Plaintiff had a verdict against defendants, and from a motion by both for a new trial, which was denied, their appeal brings the evidence, upon a settled case, into this court for review.
To understand the issues accurately, it is necessary to state the facts leading to the assault…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rauma v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- County Commissioners v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
3Cited by6 opinions
- Waylander-Peterson Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Nelson v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Lawrence v. Great Northern Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
- Doyle v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State v. PedersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.