Legal Opinion

Hercules Iron Works v. Dodsworth

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided October 2, 1893No. 4,481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

,. At Law. Action by the Hercules Iron Works against Caleb , Dodswbrth and others to recover the contract price of an ice machine. There was a verdict for plaintiff, and defendants now move : for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

TAFT, Circuit Judge.

A verdict was rendered by a jury duly ■impaneled in favor of the plaintiff, the Hercules Iron Works, for the purchase price of an ice machine furnished by plaintiff to defendants under 'a written contract and guaranty, less certain credits'which, plaintiff conceded, should be allowed on the claim. The •contract described the machine to be furnished by specifications of ’’its various parts, and contained the warranty “that the machine •shall be capable of producing 25 tons of good, crystal, merchantable *557ice each twenty-four hours of continuous operation, provided it is kept…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Detroit Heating & Lighting Co. v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Skinner Manufacturing Co. v. Carrier Engineering Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API