State v. Hirt

¶1 Patrick Hirt (Hirt) appeals from a May 11, 2004, judgment of the District Court for the Twenty-First Judicial District, Ravalli County, ordering Hirt to pay restitution and the costs of his court-appointed counsel. We reverse and remand.

¶2 We rephrase and address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court lawfully order Hirt to pay $2,500 in restitution?

¶4 2. Did the District Court lawfully order Hirt to pay the costs of his court-appointed counsel?

BACKGROUND

¶5 On June 3, 2003, Hirt was charged by Information with sexual intercourse without consent, and felony sexual…