Legal Opinion

Dir. of Highways v. Kleines

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1974No. 73-501PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.O’Neill, C. J.

Appellant frames the issne in this appeal in a single proposition of law, as follows:

“Under Civil Rule 42(A), the Common Pleas Court has no discretion to consolidate appropriation cases filed under Chapter 5519, Revised Code, without the consent of both thé property owner and the state of Ohio. It is an abase of discretion for the trial conrt, without the consent of the Director of Highways, to consolidate four cases for trial involving four separate and distinct parcels of land and four separate and distinct property owners, even thpngh the property owners are in some sense…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission v. MorleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Price v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Monus v. DayOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Ravenscraft v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Waterman v. KitrickOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Carter v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API