Byrum v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the district court of Grady county of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon, and their punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of three years.
The évidence of the state was that the defendants resided at Maud, Okla.; that on the evening of the shooting a long-distance call was placed from Maud to Tuttle asking for Homer Cherry; that, as soon as the parties were told that he was in Tuttle, they hung up the receiver; that a telephone call was put in by defendant, Byrum, from…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gritts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Herndon v. City of McAlesterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
- Whitlow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Newbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Love v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- Byars v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.