Legal Opinion

In Re the Alleged Unethical Conduct of Gelzer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 22, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We are concerned here with two presentments filed against respondent by the Bergen County Ethics and Grievance Committee. The first found him guilty of unprofessional conduct (a) in failing to obtain promptly a policy of title insurance in accordance with an agreement made with his client, and (b) in failing to record promptly the deed which had been executed and delivered to him for recordation. The second declared him guilty of commingling trust funds belonging to his client with personal funds.

Our study of the record relating to the first charge reveals that Gelzer was plainly negligent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re BaronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. In Re BannerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FractionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Nappen v. BlanchardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API