Legal Opinion

R. W. Cramer Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 22, 1951No. C. D. 1315PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lawkence, Judge:

Certain merchandise described on tbe consular invoice accompanying tbe entry covered by tbis protest as “Allen’s 36% Cobalt Steel Permanent Magnets” was classified by tbe collector of customs as parts of subsynchronous motors of less than one-fortietb of one horsepower valued at not more than $3 each within tbe purview of paragraph 368 (a) (c) (6) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 368 (a) (c) (6)), and subjected to duty at the rate of 65 per centum ad valorem.

Various claims for relief were made by plaintiff in its protest but tbe only one relied upon at tbe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gamble Vargish & Co. v. Untied StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API