Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue v. Indian Head Mining Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Justice.

The question here is whether a piece of equipment used in connection with a coal-mining operation is exempt from the use tax (KRS 139.310) under KRS 139.480(8) and KRS 139.170.

KRS 139.480(8) excludes from the tax “Machinery for new and expanded industry,” which is defined by KRS 139.170 as “that machinery used directly in the manufacturing process,” etc.

The appellee is engaged in a form of deep-mining called “punch-mining.” A bulldozer and end-loader, or “wheel loader,” are used to clear the overburden from a seam of coal, which is then undercut, blasted loose, and removed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schenley Distillers, Inc. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. LuckettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  2. Colley v. Eastern Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Department of Revenue v. State Contracting & Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API