Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Shelby County Court. Heard before Hon. E. S. Lyman. Application for mandamus by Farson, Son & Company against J. S. Bird, County Treasurer, to compel him to pay certain warrants held by petitioner. Judgment for respondent and petitioner appeals.
1Per curiam
This is an application for mandamus to compel the treasurer of Shelby county to pay certain county warrants held by petitioners, which warrants are past due.(1) It is well-settled law that mandamus will lie to compel a treasurer to pay a special claim out of a special fund, and in some cases it will lie, though an action might be maintained against him for sueh failure. — Sessions v. Boykin, 78 Ala. 328; Wyker v. Francis, 120 Ala. 520, 24 South. 895.(2) There is a class of claims, however, as to which it is held that mandamus will not lie against a county treasurer for failure to pay, even…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tarver v. Comm'rs' Ct.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Commissioners Court v. RatherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
- Sessions v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- State ex rel. Norwood v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Wyker v. FrancisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Denson v. HowzeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Weakley v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Williams v. Board of Dental Examiners of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Hasty v. Marengo County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Kilgore v. SwindleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.