Legal Opinion
In Re Turner
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 31, 2006No. 14-05100PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN E. WAITES, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon Citifinancial Auto Corporation’s (“Citifinancial”) objection to a Chapter 13 plan proposed by Annie M. Turner (“Debtor”). Under the terms of Debtor’s proposed Chapter 13 plan, Debtor intends to treat Citifinaneial’s claim as an unsecured claim. Conversely, Citifinancial contends that its claim should be treated as a secured claim and paid in full under Debtor’s plan. In light of the evidence and legal arguments presented by the parties, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. 1
FINDINGS…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- David H. Hillman Suzanne Hillman v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- In Re EzellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Rebecca Jo Reser v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- In Re CarverUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Citifinancial Auto v. Hernandez-SimpsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- In Re TrejosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2006
- In Re HayesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2007
- In Re MurrayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2006
- In Re MunzbergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.