Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Simmons

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 20, 1982No. Civ. 3277PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a divorce case.

After an ore tenus hearing the trial court in pertinent part made a division of property, established visitation privileges and failed to award periodic alimony. The wife then filed a motion to amend pursuant to rule 59, A.R.Civ.P. in order to amend that judgment as it pertained to the aforesaid actions. The motion was denied by the trial court and the wife appeals. We find no reversible error and affirm.

We do not deem it necessary nor prudent to set out in detail the facts of the instant appeal. Pertinent facts will be discussed as they relate to the issues presented.

I

T…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sutton v. SuttonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. Allen v. AllenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Marr v. MarrCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Hall v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  5. Marks v. MarksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hurd v. HurdCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. West v. WestCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  3. Easterling v. EasterlingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Brothers v. BrothersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Wilson v. WilsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API