Legal Opinion

Colonial Hill Co. v. Moncrief Furnace Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1931No. 21214PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

The second headnote only will be discussed. This action in trover was between the original seller of the property sued for and a third person—not the original purchaser. Upon the trial the plaintiff elected to take a money' verdict, and the trial judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury, rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the exact amount of the purchase-price of the property as set forth in the retention-of-title contract.

It is well settled, that, “to authorize a money verdict in a trover suit, there must be some evidence to show the value of the personal property…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elder v. Woodruff Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Lott v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Watson & Powers v. LoughranSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Oglesby v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lasch v. Columbus Heating & Ventilating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Slaton v. Parker Heating CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API