Colonial Hill Co. v. Moncrief Furnace Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
The second headnote only will be discussed. This action in trover was between the original seller of the property sued for and a third person—not the original purchaser. Upon the trial the plaintiff elected to take a money' verdict, and the trial judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury, rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the exact amount of the purchase-price of the property as set forth in the retention-of-title contract.
It is well settled, that, “to authorize a money verdict in a trover suit, there must be some evidence to show the value of the personal property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elder v. Woodruff Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Lott v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Watson & Powers v. LoughranSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Oglesby v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lasch v. Columbus Heating & Ventilating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Slaton v. Parker Heating CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963