Legal Opinion · Dissent

Raisler v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1985No. 84-372Published

1DissentJustice Gulbrandson

I concur with the response to certified question No. 1, but would respond “no” to certified question No. 2.

The majority opinion states:

“The legislative purpose behind Section 39-71-411, MCA, is to continue to guarantee limited liability to employers covered by the Act. The statutory prohibition against third party claims for constitution or indemnity was enacted with the purpose of perpetuating Montana’s workers’ compensation system in light of recent tort law development.” (Emphasis added.)

In my view, the majority has done more than “continue” or “perpetuate” what was present at the time the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DeShaw v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Howard S. Wright Construction Co. v. F. E. DeBeer Mechanical Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API