Legal Opinion
Alvarado v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 28, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00331Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JOSE ALVARADO, Plaintiff, No. 3:23-cv-331 (SRU) v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Third-party defendants Sandra Davis and EAN Holdings, LLC (“EAN”) have moved to dismiss the United States’ third-party apportionment complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. For the following reasons, I grant the motion, doc. no. 24, and dismiss the third-party apportionment complaint, doc. no. 15. The dismissal is without prejudice to the United States showing that Davis and EAN forfeited the challenge to personal jurisdiction. I.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.