Legal Opinion

Baker v. English

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1995No. 9211-08042; CA A81150PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*45DEITS, P. J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment for plaintiff in this medical malpractice action. We reverse in part.

Plaintiff1 suffered from AIDS, and defendant was his treating physician. In the course of treatment, defendant prescribed a sulfa-based medicine for plaintiff, despite the fact of which defendant reasonably should have been aware that plaintiff was allergic to sulfa preparations. Plaintiff suffered severe and protracted diarrhea and weight loss as a result. An extensive period of hospitalization was required before the condition could be remedied, and defendant at one point…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. PORTLAND TERMINAL RAILROAD COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Wells v. MarleauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Doran v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Turnbow v. K.E. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. McClusky v. City of North BendCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Sleigh v. Jenny Craig Weight Loss Centres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Jessen v. ColtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API