Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Arbitration between New York State Office of Alcoholism & Substance Abuse Services & Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 2009Published

1Dissent

Kavanagh, J. (dissenting).

We dissent. While petitioners in this proceeding do not argue that arbitration of the issues is prohibited by public policy concerns, we conclude, for the same reasons as we did in Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. (Lanterman) (62 AD3d 1109 [2009] [decided herewith]), that the parties did not agree, and for that matter could not have agreed, “to arbitrate the particular dispute” of respondent Victor Ortiz’s lack of the statutorily required certification (Matter of County of Chautauqua v Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. County of Chautauqua v. Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 1000New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. In re the Arbitration between New York State Office of Children & Family Services & LantermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API