Bata Shoe Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
The Renegotiation Board determined that Bata Shoe Company ("Bata” or "Bata Shoe”) had realized excessive profits of $800,000 for the year 1967. Plaintiff sought a de novo review of that determination in this court pursuant to the Renegotiation Act of 1951, 50 U.S.C. §§ 1211-1233 (1970) as amended (Supp. V, 1975). Trial Judge Bernhardt reviewed each of the statutory factors in 50 U.S.C. § 1213(e) (1970) and found that plaintiff was entitled to favorable consideration under each factor. He then concluded that plaintiff was not guilty of "profiteering” and was therefore entitled to a clearance.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Major Coat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- A. C. Ball Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Aero Spacelines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Butkin Precision Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Spectrum Sciences & Software, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Equipment, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Shinn Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Simmonds Precision Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.