Legal Opinion

London Grove Contractors, Inc. v. J. Robert Pierson, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1984No. 19-10941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue in this case is whether a creditor, who commenced garnishment proceedings against the debtor grounded on a lawsuit instituted by the debtor against a third party, has a valid lien on the settlement proceeds of that action where the settlement occurred after the debtor filed for relief under the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”). If so, we must determine if the creditor is entitled to relief from the automatic stay imposed by the Code in order to appropriate the fund. For the reasons stated herein we find that the creditor has no lien on the fund…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Girard Fire & Marine Insurance v. Field, Merritt & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  2. Selheimer v. ElderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  3. Eaton v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
  4. Decker v. Central Soya Co. (In Re Decker)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. London Grove Contractors, Inc. v. J. Robert Pierson, Inc. (In Re J. Robert Pierson, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Pennsylvania Capital Bank v. Glosser (In Re Allen)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Schreiber v. KelloggDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Litman v. Levine (In re Levine)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API