Legal Opinion

Hutcheson v. Sumrall, Et Ux.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1954No. 39075PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lee, J..Fred Hutcheson and others filed their bill against O. E. and Mrs. O. E. Sumrall, in the Chancery Court of Sunflower County, for a mandatory injunction to require that their water supply, which the defendants had cut off, should be turned on. The amended bill alleged in effect that they, and their predecessors in title, owned and were in possession of their respective properties before and at the time the defendants, and their predecessor in title, purchased the land on which the artesian wells were situated; and that their existing benefit, by reason of a system of pipes and conduits,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watson v. FrenchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  2. Shipman v. LovelaceMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Freiden v. Western Bank & Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dethlefs v. Beau Maison Development Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Fourth Davis Island Land Co. v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. HP Ltd. Partnership v. Kenai River Airpark, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Gulf Park Water Co. v. First Ocean Springs Dev. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Methonen v. StoneAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API