Legal Opinion

Cherryvale Investment Co. v. Dillman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 4, 1932No. 30,641Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action in replevin of an automobile. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition, and it has appealed.

The petition alleged that plaintiff is a corporation; that defendant was indebted to it on a promissory note in the sum of $1,196, due February 24, 1931; that on March 28 of that year, through its president and secretary, plaintiff demanded payment of the note; that defendant said he was unable to pay the full amount of the note at once; that if plaintiff wbuld extend the date of maturity of the note for one year…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bates v. WigginSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. First National Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Weil v. RyusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Dosbaugh National Bank v. JelfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Bank of Highland v. Evans-Snider-Buell Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API