Legal Opinion

Visscher v. Ottawa Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus by Arend Visscher, prosecuting attorney of Ottawa county, to compel Philip Padgham, circuit judge of said county, to vacate an order dismissing the petition of the auditor general for the sale of lands delinquent for the taxes of 1895.

1Per curiam

The auditor general filed his petition in the circuit court for the county of Ottawa, in chancery, for the sale of lands delinquent for taxes for the year 1895. The same came on to be heard upon objections filed by certain landowners, and the court entered an order dismissing the petition, and denying the decree prayed for. The prosecuting attorney for the county applies for the writ of mandamus to compel the circuit judge to vacate this order, and grant the decree. Upon denying the petition, the learned circuit judge filed a written opinion, of which the following are the material portions :

“…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Auditor General v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Schaale v. WaseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wieser v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Cole v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gurd v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API