Brock v. State

Count 5 of the indictment, under which this defendant was convicted, reads as follows:

“Count 5. The grand jury of said county further charge that before, the finding of this indictment and since the 30th day of September, 1919, that Charlie Brock did have in his possession á still, apparatus, or appliance to be used for the purpose of manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages contrary to law.” •

No demurrer or other objection was interposed to the indictment, or to any count thereof; and on this appeal, for the first time, insistence is made that count 5, under…