Legal Opinion

Illinois National Insurance Co. v. Perez

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 31, 1990No. 13-89-238-CVPublished

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

On rehearing, Illinois reargues four of its original points of error. We overrule the motion for rehearing and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Illinois contends that this court erred by failing to address and ultimately hold that the doctrine of res judicata precluded the default judgment favoring respondents.

This court addressed the issue of res judicata in Marange v. Marshall, 402 *377S.W.2d 236, 240 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1966, writ ref'd n.r.e.) saying:

The general principle, announced in numerous cases, is that a right, question, or fact, distinctly put in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marange v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Ischy v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Chambers v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  4. McCollum v. Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  5. Vanguard Insurance Co. v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API