Legal Opinion

Behrens v. O'Melia

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 23, 2003No. 1 CA-SA 03-0146PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioners Robert and Teri Behrens (“Defendants”) ask this court to accept special action jurisdiction and reverse the trial court’s grant of a change of venue to Pinal County. Defendants contend that they have no adequate remedy by appeal. We accept jurisdiction because the granting of a motion for change of venue is a nonappealable order. Lakritz v. Superior Court, 179 Ariz. 598, 599, 880 P.2d 1144, 1145 (App.1994). By previous order, we accepted jurisdiction and denied relief with an opinion to follow. This is that opinion.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. EastlackArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Piner v. Superior Court in and for County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Pride v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dunn v. CarruthArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Cacho v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. Montoya-PaezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. YARBROUGH v. ROBERTS ENTERPRISES, DeWITT, AVATOR HOLDINGSCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API