Legal Opinion
Kroh Bros. Development Co. v. United Missouri Bank of Kansas City (In Re Kroh Bros. Development Co.)
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided July 31, 1989No. 89-W-207-1, Adv. No. 89-4035-1-11PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHIPPLE, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s motion for leave to appeal and plaintiff’s motion to dismiss interlocutory appeal taken by de fendants. 1 Defendants (See Footnote 1, supra) seek appellate review of the Bankruptcy Court’s 2 denial of its motion to dismiss and to stay proceedings. Plaintiffs argue that the appeal must be dismissed for failure to obtain certification by the bankruptcy court and, in the alternative, leave to appeal should not be granted because the essential elements for an interlocutory appeal have not been satisfied and therefore defendants’ appeal…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph SHOAF, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- In the Matter of MORSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Debtor. Appeal of HOOSIER FENCE COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harstad v. First American BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Zahn v. Yucaipa Capital FundDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998
- Pate v. Hunt (In Re Hunt)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. (In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Winston & Strawn v. Kelly (In Re Churchfield Management & Investment Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.