Legal Opinion

Pantera Energy Company v. Railroad Commission of Texas ConocoPhillips Company And Pioneer Natural Resources, USA

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided February 5, 2004No. 03-02-00474-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN 444444444444444444444444444 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING 444444444444444444444444444 NO. 03-02-00474-CV NO. 03-03-00045-CV NO. 03-03-00046-CV Pantera Energy Company, Appellant v. Railroad Commission of Texas; ConocoPhillips Company; and Pioneer Natural Resources, USA, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOS. GN103473, GN200177 & GN200727, HONORABLE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION To address concerns raised in the Railroad Commission’s motion for rehearing, we withdraw our original opinion and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Williams v. LaraTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Camarena v. Texas Employment CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API