Legal Opinion

Louis McCasland, Jr. v. City of Castroville

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 21, 2013No. 12-50840UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiffs brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in federal court alleging that the city of Castroville had deprived them of property without due process of law, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Specifically, Plaintiffs alleged that Castro-ville had denied them the right to continue leasing property at the Castroville Municipal Airport. The district court dismissed Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), holding that Plaintiffs’ allegations did not establish that they had any cognizable property interest in the airport…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. The Interface Group, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. DePree v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Four T's, Inc., Doing Business as Dollar Rent a Car of Little Rock v. Little Rock Municipal Airport CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Papagolos v. Lafayette County School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2013
  2. Rose v. Wayne County Airport AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  3. Supreme Home Health Servs., Inc. v. AzarDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
  4. Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2013
  5. Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. v. Town of East HamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API