Keathley v. Hancock
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, P. J.
This appeal involves the correctness of the action of the trial court in striking the answer of the Express Company, garnishee, and rendition of judgment by default against that Company and against Keathley, under the circumstances now set out.
Mrs. Hancock, as plaintiff, asserted in her declaration that she became ill from eating deleterious pies prepared and sold by Keathley to the general public. The ground of liability was breach of an implied warranty that the food was fit for human consumption. The pies were prepared by Keathley in Memphis, Tennessee, the domicile of Keathley’s place of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Joseph Mogul, Inc. v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. LyonMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- Craig v. GaddisMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
- Givens v. Southern Express Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harkins v. PaschallMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- Quick Shops of Mississippi, Inc. v. BruceMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
- Herrin Transportation Co. v. Robert E. Olson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Williams v. WhitfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- Day v. Temple Drilling Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1985