Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Clarke v. Board of County Commrs.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1943No. 29237PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Section 1639-18, General Code, a part .of the Juvenile Court Act, provides:
“The judge may appoint a chief probation officer * * * and as many * * * employees as may be necessary. Such appointees shall receive such compensation and expenses as the judge shall determine, and shall serve during the pleasure of the judge. '
“The compensation of the probation officers and other employees shall be paid in semi-monthly installments by the county treasurer from the county treas ury, upon the warrant of the county auditor, certified to by the judge of the court.”
Section 1639-57 reads in part:
“It is…
2Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Foster v. WittenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Edwards v. MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Weaver v. Lake County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Motter v. AtkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- State ex rel. Milligan v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.