Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Clarke v. Board of County Commrs.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1943No. 29237PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Section 1639-18, General Code, a part .of the Juvenile Court Act, provides:

“The judge may appoint a chief probation officer * * * and as many * * * employees as may be necessary. Such appointees shall receive such compensation and expenses as the judge shall determine, and shall serve during the pleasure of the judge. '
“The compensation of the probation officers and other employees shall be paid in semi-monthly installments by the county treasurer from the county treas ury, upon the warrant of the county auditor, certified to by the judge of the court.”

Section 1639-57 reads in part:

“It is…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Foster v. WittenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State ex rel. Edwards v. MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State ex rel. Weaver v. Lake County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. Motter v. AtkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State ex rel. Milligan v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API